In the world of technology M&A, earn-outs are often the bridge between a seller’s valuation expectations and a buyer’s risk tolerance. But while they can unlock additional value for founders, they also introduce complexity, uncertainty, and—if not carefully structured—potential for post-deal conflict.
So how should a tech founder or CEO approach earn-out negotiations? The answer lies in understanding the strategic purpose of earn-outs, aligning incentives, and negotiating terms that are both measurable and achievable. This article explores how to do just that, with insights drawn from real-world transactions and the advisory experience of firms like iMerge, which specializes in software and technology M&A.
What Is an Earn-Out?
An earn-out is a contractual provision in an acquisition agreement that ties a portion of the purchase price to the future performance of the business. Typically, the seller receives an upfront payment at closing, with additional payments contingent on hitting specific financial or operational milestones over a defined period—usually 12 to 36 months.
Earn-outs are especially common in tech deals where:
The target is a high-growth SaaS or software company with limited operating history
There’s a valuation gap between buyer and seller expectations
The founder or key team members are expected to stay on post-acquisition
While earn-outs can help get deals across the finish line, they also require careful structuring to avoid misaligned incentives or post-close disputes.
Key Principles for Negotiating Earn-Outs
1. Define Clear, Objective Metrics
The most common earn-out metrics in tech M&A include:
Where possible, tie earn-outs to metrics that are within the seller’s control and not easily manipulated by the buyer post-close. For example, EBITDA-based earn-outs can be problematic if the buyer allocates overhead or changes accounting policies. In contrast, revenue-based earn-outs—especially recurring revenue—tend to be more transparent and defensible.
As we noted in Website Valuation and Discretionary Earnings, clarity in financial definitions is essential. The same applies here: define terms like “revenue” or “net income” precisely in the purchase agreement.
2. Align Incentives with Post-Close Realities
Earn-outs work best when the seller remains actively involved in the business post-acquisition. If the founder is stepping away, the buyer assumes operational control—and the seller’s ability to influence outcomes diminishes. In such cases, earn-outs may be inappropriate or should be heavily discounted in valuation discussions.
Conversely, if the founder is staying on as a division head or product lead, an earn-out can serve as a powerful incentive. But it must be structured to reflect the new reporting lines, decision-making authority, and resource allocation. For example, if the seller is responsible for hitting a revenue target, they must have the budget and autonomy to execute their go-to-market strategy.
3. Cap the Earn-Out Period and Amount
Earn-outs should be time-bound and capped. A typical structure might include:
12–36 months of performance measurement
Earn-out payments tied to annual or cumulative targets
A maximum earn-out amount (e.g., 20–40% of total deal value)
Open-ended or uncapped earn-outs create uncertainty and can lead to disputes. Buyers may also prefer shorter earn-out periods to accelerate integration and reduce contingent liabilities.
4. Negotiate Protections and Governance Rights
To protect your ability to achieve the earn-out, consider negotiating:
Operating covenants that prevent the buyer from materially changing the business model
In some cases, sellers may also negotiate a “catch-up” provision—if the business misses a target one year but exceeds it the next, the seller can still earn a portion of the deferred payment.
5. Understand the Tax and Legal Implications
Earn-out payments are typically taxed as ordinary income or capital gains depending on how they’re structured. The timing of recognition, installment treatment, and potential escrow arrangements can all impact your after-tax proceeds.
Consider a fictional but representative example: a founder of a $5M ARR vertical SaaS company receives an acquisition offer of $15M—$10M upfront and $5M in earn-outs over two years, contingent on hitting 30% YoY ARR growth.
With guidance from an M&A advisor like iMerge, the founder negotiates:
Quarterly reporting and transparency rights
Defined sales and marketing budget commitments
A catch-up clause if ARR growth is delayed but recovers
Capital gains treatment for earn-out payments
Ultimately, the company hits 28% growth in year one and 35% in year two. Thanks to the catch-up clause, the founder receives 90% of the earn-out—preserving alignment and avoiding litigation.
When to Push Back on Earn-Outs
Not all earn-outs are worth accepting. Founders should be cautious if:
The earn-out comprises more than 50% of the total deal value
The buyer refuses to define performance metrics clearly
The seller has no post-close control or visibility
The earn-out is based on integration synergies or cost savings
In such cases, it may be better to negotiate a lower upfront price with fewer contingencies—or walk away entirely.
Final Thoughts
Earn-outs are a powerful but double-edged tool in tech M&A. When structured thoughtfully, they can bridge valuation gaps and reward performance. When poorly designed, they can lead to misalignment, disputes, and lost value.
Firms like iMerge help founders navigate these complexities by modeling earn-out scenarios, negotiating protective terms, and aligning deal structure with long-term goals. Whether you’re selling a SaaS platform, a niche software tool, or a data-driven application, the right advisory support can make the difference between a fair deal and a frustrating one.
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
What Are the Key Terms in an M&A Agreement for Tech Companies?
In the world of software and technology M&A, the devil is in the details. While headlines often focus on valuation multiples or strategic synergies, the real substance of a deal lies in the definitive agreement — the legal contract that governs the transaction. For founders, CEOs, and investors navigating a tech exit, understanding the key terms in an M&A agreement is not just a legal exercise — it’s a strategic imperative.
This article outlines the most critical terms in a tech M&A agreement, with a focus on how they impact value realization, risk allocation, and post-closing outcomes. Whether you’re selling a SaaS platform, a cybersecurity firm, or a niche AI tool, these terms will shape your deal’s success.
1. Purchase Price and Consideration Structure
At the heart of any M&A agreement is the purchase price — but how that price is paid matters just as much as the number itself. In tech deals, consideration often includes a mix of:
Cash at closing – The most straightforward and preferred form of payment.
Equity rollover – Common in private equity transactions, where founders retain a stake in the new entity.
Earn-outs – Contingent payments based on future performance, often used to bridge valuation gaps.
Escrow holdbacks – A portion of the purchase price held in escrow to cover post-closing indemnities.
Each of these components carries different tax, risk, and liquidity implications. As we’ve discussed in How Do I Handle Earn-Outs in the Sale of My Software Business, earn-outs can be particularly tricky — aligning incentives while avoiding disputes requires careful structuring and clear metrics.
2. Representations and Warranties
Reps and warranties are the seller’s assertions about the business — from financial statements and IP ownership to compliance and customer contracts. In tech M&A, these often include:
Intellectual property ownership – Confirming that all code, patents, and trademarks are properly assigned and free of encumbrances.
Data privacy and security compliance – Especially critical for SaaS and AI companies handling user data.
Open-source software usage – Misuse or improper licensing can derail a deal late in diligence.
Buyers rely on these reps to assess risk. If any turn out to be false post-closing, the seller may be liable for damages. That’s why firms like iMerge often recommend conducting a pre-LOI diligence review to identify and address potential red flags early.
3. Indemnification Provisions
Indemnification clauses allocate post-closing risk. If a buyer suffers losses due to a breach of reps and warranties, they may seek compensation from the seller. Key terms include:
Cap – The maximum amount the seller can be liable for (often a percentage of the purchase price).
Basket – A threshold of losses that must be met before indemnification kicks in.
Survival period – How long the reps and warranties remain enforceable post-closing.
In tech deals, IP and data security breaches often carry longer survival periods or even “fundamental” status, meaning they’re not subject to caps or baskets. Sellers should negotiate these terms carefully, especially when dealing with strategic acquirers or international buyers.
4. Working Capital Adjustments
Most M&A agreements include a working capital adjustment to ensure the business is delivered with a normalized level of short-term assets and liabilities. This is particularly important in SaaS businesses with deferred revenue or annual billing cycles.
Misunderstanding how deferred revenue is treated can lead to post-closing disputes. As we noted in How Do I Present Deferred Revenue During an M&A Process, clarity around revenue recognition and contract liabilities is essential for both parties.
5. Covenants and Closing Conditions
Between signing and closing, both parties agree to certain covenants — promises about how the business will be operated. These may include:
Conduct of business – Restrictions on hiring, spending, or entering new contracts.
Non-solicitation and non-compete clauses – Preventing the seller from poaching employees or launching a competing venture.
Regulatory approvals – Especially relevant in cross-border deals or those involving sensitive technologies.
Failure to meet closing conditions — such as obtaining third-party consents or clearing antitrust hurdles — can delay or derail a deal. This is why experienced advisors like iMerge help clients anticipate and navigate these issues early in the process.
6. Employee and Founder Retention
In tech M&A, talent is often as valuable as the product. Buyers may require key employees or founders to sign new employment agreements, equity incentive plans, or retention bonuses. These terms are typically negotiated in parallel with the main agreement and can materially affect the deal’s success.
Founders should also consider how these terms align with their personal goals. Are you staying on for a transition period? Rolling equity into a new entity? These decisions have both financial and lifestyle implications.
7. Dispute Resolution and Governing Law
While often overlooked, the choice of governing law and dispute resolution mechanism can have real consequences. Arbitration vs. litigation, jurisdiction, and venue — these terms determine how conflicts are resolved if things go sideways.
Understanding the key terms in an M&A agreement is more than a legal checklist — it’s a roadmap for value preservation, risk mitigation, and post-deal success. For tech founders, these terms can shape everything from your final payout to your future role in the business.
Firms like iMerge specialize in helping software and technology companies navigate these complexities — from exit planning strategy to final negotiations. With the right guidance, you can approach the deal table with clarity, confidence, and leverage.
Use this insight in your next board discussion or strategic planning session. When you’re ready, iMerge is available for private, advisor-level conversations.
How to Prepare Your Financial Statements for the Sale Process
When a software or technology company enters the M&A arena, financial statements become more than just a record of past performance—they become a lens through which buyers assess risk, validate valuation, and forecast future returns. For founders and CEOs contemplating a sale, preparing your financials is not a back-office task—it’s a strategic imperative.
This article outlines how to prepare your financial statements for the sale process, what buyers expect, and how to avoid common pitfalls that can derail a deal or reduce your valuation.
Why Financial Statement Preparation Matters in M&A
Buyers—whether private equity firms, strategic acquirers, or family offices—rely heavily on financial statements to assess the health and scalability of your business. Clean, accurate, and GAAP-compliant financials are often a prerequisite for serious offers. In fact, as we noted in Completing Due Diligence Before the LOI, financial clarity can accelerate deal timelines and reduce the risk of post-LOI retrading.
Conversely, disorganized or inconsistent financials can raise red flags, trigger extended due diligence, or even lead to deal abandonment. Preparing your financials is not just about compliance—it’s about positioning your company as a credible, investable asset.
Key Steps to Prepare Your Financial Statements for Sale
1. Convert to Accrual Accounting (If You Haven’t Already)
Many early-stage companies operate on a cash basis for simplicity. However, most acquirers—especially institutional buyers—expect accrual-based financials. Accrual accounting provides a more accurate picture of revenue recognition, expenses, and profitability over time.
For SaaS companies, this is particularly important. Deferred revenue, prepaid contracts, and multi-year subscriptions must be properly accounted for. If you’re still on a cash basis, work with your controller or CPA to convert historical financials to accrual before going to market.
2. Ensure GAAP Compliance
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) provide a standardized framework that buyers trust. While audited GAAP financials are not always required, they are often expected for deals above $10M in enterprise value. At a minimum, your financials should be reviewed or compiled by a reputable CPA firm and follow GAAP conventions.
Key areas to review for GAAP compliance include:
Revenue recognition policies (especially for SaaS or subscription models)
Capitalization of software development costs
Amortization and depreciation schedules
Expense classification (e.g., COGS vs. operating expenses)
3. Reconcile and Normalize Your Financials
Buyers will want to understand your true operating performance. That means removing one-time, non-recurring, or owner-specific expenses from your income statement to calculate adjusted EBITDA or seller’s discretionary earnings (SDE).
For deals above $5M–$10M, buyers often commission a third-party Quality of Earnings (QoE) report. However, proactive sellers can benefit from preparing a sell-side QoE in advance. This report validates your revenue streams, expense structure, and EBITDA adjustments, reducing surprises during due diligence.
Firms like iMerge often coordinate with accounting partners to prepare QoE reports that align with buyer expectations and streamline the diligence process.
5. Segment Revenue and Costs by Business Line
Buyers want to understand what’s driving your growth. Segmenting your financials by product line, customer cohort, or geography can help demonstrate where value is being created—and where risks may lie.
For example, a SaaS company with 80% of revenue from a single enterprise client may face concentration risk. Breaking out revenue by customer or contract type can help buyers assess sustainability and scalability.
6. Build a Robust Financial Data Room
Once your financials are clean and normalized, organize them in a secure data room. Include:
Three years of income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements
Even strong companies can stumble during the sale process if their financials raise concerns. Watch out for these common issues:
Inconsistent revenue recognition: Especially in SaaS, improper treatment of deferred revenue can distort profitability.
Unreconciled bank accounts or AR/AP balances: These suggest weak internal controls.
Missing documentation: Lack of backup for key contracts, invoices, or expense allocations can delay or kill deals.
Overstated add-backs: Buyers will scrutinize EBITDA adjustments. Unsupported or aggressive add-backs can erode trust.
Should You Get Audited Financials?
While not always required, audited financials can increase buyer confidence—especially for deals involving institutional capital. If your company is approaching $10M+ in revenue or targeting a strategic buyer, consider commissioning an audit 12–18 months before going to market.
Alternatively, a reviewed financial statement (less rigorous than an audit but more credible than internal books) may suffice for mid-market transactions.
Final Thoughts
Preparing your financial statements for a sale is not just about cleaning up the books—it’s about telling a compelling, credible story of your company’s performance and potential. The more transparent and organized your financials, the more leverage you’ll have in negotiations.
Firms like iMerge specialize in helping software and technology companies navigate this process—from financial preparation to valuation modeling and deal execution. Whether you’re 12 months from a sale or fielding inbound interest now, getting your financial house in order is the first step toward a successful exit.
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
Who Are the Most Active Buyers of Software Companies Right Now?
In today’s software M&A landscape, the question isn’t whether there’s buyer interest — it’s who’s still writing checks, and why. As macroeconomic uncertainty lingers and valuation multiples recalibrate, the buyer universe has shifted. Some players have pulled back. Others are doubling down. For software founders and CEOs considering a sale or capital raise, understanding who’s active — and what they’re looking for — is critical to positioning your company for a successful outcome.
This article outlines the most active categories of buyers in the software M&A market today, what’s driving their strategies, and how sellers can align with the right acquirers.
1. Private Equity Firms: Still the Dominant Force
Private equity (PE) firms remain the most active buyers of software companies, particularly in the lower-middle and middle market. Despite tighter credit conditions, many PE funds are sitting on record levels of dry powder. According to PitchBook’s Q1 2024 Global PE Report, software continues to be one of the most targeted sectors, accounting for over 25% of all PE deal volume.
What’s changed is how PE firms are deploying capital:
Platform + Add-On Strategies: Many firms are focused on building vertical software platforms through roll-ups. A PE firm may acquire a $20M ARR platform and bolt on smaller $3–10M ARR companies to expand functionality or geographic reach.
Operational Playbooks: Buyers are increasingly focused on operational efficiency — not just growth. Firms with proven playbooks for improving retention, pricing, or sales efficiency are winning deals.
Valuation Discipline: PE buyers are more selective on price. As we noted in EBITDA Multiples Continue to Trend Lower, multiples have compressed, especially for companies with subpar retention or low margins.
Firms like Thoma Bravo, Vista Equity, and Insight Partners continue to lead the charge at the upper end, while a long tail of sector-focused PE firms are active in the $10M–$100M enterprise value range.
2. Strategic Acquirers: Selective but Opportunistic
Strategic buyers — including large public software companies and private tech incumbents — are still active, but more cautious. Many are focused on profitability and capital efficiency in their own operations, which has tempered M&A appetite. That said, when a target aligns with a strategic roadmap, these buyers can move quickly and pay a premium.
Key themes driving strategic acquisitions:
AI and Automation: Companies with proprietary AI models or automation capabilities are in high demand. Strategic buyers are looking to accelerate their AI roadmaps through acquisition.
Customer Base Expansion: Acquirers are targeting companies with strong customer relationships in adjacent verticals or geographies.
Product Gaps: Strategics are filling holes in their product suites — especially in areas like cybersecurity, DevOps, and vertical SaaS.
For example, Adobe’s acquisition of Figma and Cisco’s purchase of Splunk reflect a broader trend: strategic buyers are willing to pay up for category leaders that offer long-term strategic value.
3. Founder-Led and Bootstrapped Buyers: A Growing Niche
In the sub-$10M ARR range, a new class of buyers has emerged: founder-led holdcos, micro-PE firms, and search funds. These buyers often target profitable, bootstrapped SaaS businesses with low churn and strong cash flow. Their value proposition? Long-term stewardship, not a quick flip.
These buyers are particularly active in:
Vertical SaaS: Niche markets with loyal customer bases and low competition.
Low-Churn, High-Margin Models: Businesses with 90%+ gross margins and 90%+ net revenue retention.
Owner Transitions: Founders looking to exit without joining a large corporate structure.
While these buyers may not offer the highest headline price, they often provide flexible deal structures, including seller financing or earn-outs. For founders prioritizing legacy or team continuity, they can be a compelling option.
4. International Buyers: Expanding U.S. Footprints
Cross-border M&A is rebounding, particularly from European and Canadian buyers seeking U.S. market access. These acquirers are often looking for:
U.S.-based customer bases
Established go-to-market teams
Regulatory or compliance capabilities (e.g., HIPAA, SOC 2)
While traditional venture capital has pulled back from late-stage rounds, corporate venture arms and growth equity firms are selectively investing in companies with strong fundamentals. These buyers often pursue minority investments with board seats and strategic alignment, rather than full acquisitions.
For founders not ready to sell outright, this can be a way to de-risk personally while continuing to scale. However, these deals require careful structuring — especially around control provisions and future exit rights.
How Sellers Can Align with the Right Buyer
In today’s market, it’s not just about finding a buyer — it’s about finding the right buyer. That means understanding your company’s profile and matching it to the right buyer type:
High-Growth, Venture-Backed SaaS: Likely to attract strategic buyers or growth equity firms.
Profitable, Bootstrapped Software: Attractive to PE firms, holdcos, and search funds.
AI-Enabled or Data-Rich Platforms: In demand from both strategics and PE firms building AI portfolios.
At iMerge, we help software founders navigate this landscape by identifying the most aligned buyer profiles, preparing for due diligence, and structuring deals that maximize value. As we’ve outlined in Exit Business Planning Strategy, early preparation and positioning are key to attracting the right acquirer — and commanding a premium.
Conclusion
The software M&A market remains active — but it’s more nuanced than ever. Private equity firms continue to lead in volume, while strategic buyers are selectively pursuing high-impact deals. Meanwhile, a growing ecosystem of founder-led buyers and international acquirers is reshaping the lower middle market.
For founders, the takeaway is clear: know your buyer universe, understand what they value, and prepare accordingly. The right buyer is out there — but finding them requires strategy, positioning, and expert guidance.
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
How to Structure the Sale of Your Software Company to Minimize Taxes
For software founders, selling a company is often the most significant liquidity event of their careers. But while valuation and deal terms dominate early conversations, the structure of the sale can have an equally profound impact — especially when it comes to taxes. A poorly structured deal can erode millions in value through unnecessary tax exposure. A well-structured one can preserve wealth, optimize proceeds, and even create opportunities for future upside.
This article outlines key tax considerations and structuring strategies for software company exits, drawing on insights from real-world transactions and the advisory experience of firms like iMerge, which specializes in software and technology M&A.
Asset Sale vs. Stock Sale: The Foundational Decision
The first — and often most consequential — tax decision in a software company sale is whether to structure the transaction as an asset sale or a stock sale.
Asset Sale: The buyer purchases individual assets (e.g., codebase, customer contracts, IP) and assumes selected liabilities. This structure is common in lower middle-market deals and is often preferred by buyers for its flexibility and tax benefits.
Stock Sale: The buyer acquires the equity of the company, taking ownership of all assets and liabilities. This is generally more favorable for sellers, especially from a tax perspective.
From a tax standpoint, founders typically prefer stock sales because the proceeds are taxed at long-term capital gains rates (currently 20% federally, plus 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax, and applicable state taxes). In contrast, asset sales can trigger double taxation for C-corporations — once at the corporate level and again when proceeds are distributed to shareholders.
For pass-through entities (e.g., LLCs or S-corps), asset sales may still result in higher taxes due to depreciation recapture and ordinary income treatment on certain assets.
Entity Type Matters: C-Corp vs. S-Corp vs. LLC
Your company’s legal structure plays a critical role in how sale proceeds are taxed. Here’s how it typically breaks down:
C-Corporation: Asset sales can be punitive due to double taxation. Stock sales are more tax-efficient, and if the company qualifies under IRC Section 1202, founders may be eligible for the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) exclusion — potentially eliminating up to $10 million in capital gains per founder.
S-Corporation: Avoids double taxation, but asset sales can still result in ordinary income on certain components. Stock sales are cleaner, but buyers may push for asset deals due to liability concerns.
LLC (Taxed as Partnership): Asset sales are the default and can be tax-inefficient for sellers. However, LLCs offer flexibility in allocating gains and losses among members.
Founders should evaluate whether a corporate restructuring (e.g., converting to a C-corp to qualify for QSBS) is viable well in advance of a sale. Note that QSBS eligibility requires a five-year holding period and other criteria — timing is critical.
Leveraging QSBS: A Powerful but Underutilized Tool
One of the most powerful tax planning tools for software founders is the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) exclusion under Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code. If your company qualifies, you may be able to exclude up to 100% of capital gains (up to $10 million or 10x your basis) from federal taxes.
To qualify:
The company must be a domestic C-corp
Gross assets must not have exceeded $50 million at the time of stock issuance
The company must be engaged in a qualified trade or business (most software companies qualify)
The stock must be held for at least five years
QSBS planning should begin years before a sale. If you’re within the five-year window, consider deferring the sale or exploring tax deferral strategies like installment sales or equity rollovers.
Installment Sales and Earn-Outs: Timing Matters
Another way to manage tax exposure is by spreading income over multiple years. Installment sales — where a portion of the purchase price is paid over time — can defer tax liability and potentially keep the seller in a lower tax bracket.
However, installment treatment is not available for stock sales of publicly traded companies or for sales of inventory or receivables. Additionally, earn-outs — which are common in software M&A — may be taxed as ordinary income depending on how they’re structured. Careful drafting of earn-out provisions is essential to avoid unexpected tax treatment.
Equity Rollovers: Deferring Taxes with a Second Bite
In private equity-backed deals, founders are often asked to “roll over” a portion of their equity into the new entity. This can be a tax-efficient way to defer gains and participate in future upside — the so-called “second bite at the apple.”
To qualify for tax deferral under IRC Section 351 or 721, the rollover must be structured properly. Founders should work closely with tax counsel and M&A advisors to ensure compliance and alignment with their long-term goals.
State Taxes and Residency Planning
Federal taxes are only part of the equation. State tax rates vary widely — from 0% in states like Texas and Florida to over 13% in California. If you’re considering a move to a low-tax state before a liquidity event, timing and documentation are critical. States like California aggressively challenge residency changes if they occur too close to a sale.
Residency planning should begin at least 12–18 months before a transaction and include clear evidence of intent (e.g., home purchase, voter registration, driver’s license, business relocation).
Pre-Sale Planning: The Earlier, the Better
Tax optimization is not something to address after signing a Letter of Intent. Ideally, founders should begin planning 12–24 months before a potential exit. This allows time to:
Restructure the entity if needed (e.g., convert to C-corp for QSBS)
Clean up the cap table and ensure proper stock documentation
Evaluate estate planning strategies (e.g., gifting shares to family trusts)
Model different deal structures and their tax implications
As we noted in Exit Business Planning Strategy, early alignment between legal, tax, and M&A advisors can significantly increase after-tax proceeds and reduce deal friction.
Partnering with the Right M&A Advisor
Tax structuring is deeply intertwined with deal negotiation. A seasoned M&A advisor — particularly one with experience in software and SaaS transactions — can help position your company for a tax-efficient exit while maximizing valuation and deal terms.
Firms like iMerge work closely with founders, tax counsel, and transaction attorneys to model different scenarios, negotiate favorable structures, and ensure that tax considerations are integrated into every stage of the process — from buyer targeting to LOI to closing.
Conclusion
Minimizing taxes in the sale of a software company requires more than just good accounting — it demands strategic foresight, careful structuring, and the right team of advisors. Whether it’s leveraging QSBS, negotiating a stock sale, or planning an equity rollover, the decisions you make before and during the sale process can have lasting financial consequences.
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
