by Michael Gravel | Apr 17, 2025 | iMerge M&A Dealmaker News
Summary of:
Common Pitfalls When Selling a Software Business: What Founders and CEOs Must Avoid
For many software founders, selling their business is the culmination of years—sometimes decades—of innovation, risk-taking, and relentless execution. But even the most promising exit can be derailed by avoidable missteps. In our experience advising software and SaaS companies at iMerge, we’ve seen how certain pitfalls—often overlooked in the early stages—can materially impact valuation, deal structure, and even the likelihood of closing.
This article outlines the most common pitfalls we see when software companies go to market, and how to proactively avoid them.
1. Inadequate Preparation Before Going to Market
One of the most frequent mistakes is underestimating the level of preparation required before engaging buyers. Founders often assume that a strong product and growing revenue are enough to attract premium offers. In reality, buyers—especially private equity firms and strategic acquirers—expect a well-documented, diligence-ready business.
Key areas where unpreparedness shows up:
- Financials: Lack of GAAP-compliant statements, unclear revenue recognition, or inconsistent ARR/MRR reporting.
- Customer contracts: Missing assignment clauses or auto-renewal terms that complicate transferability.
- IP ownership: Unclear or incomplete IP assignment from early contractors or developers.
As we noted in Top 10 Items to Prepare When Selling Your Website, the earlier you begin preparing your documentation, the smoother the diligence process will be—and the more leverage you’ll retain in negotiations.
2. Misunderstanding Valuation Drivers
Software founders often anchor to headline multiples they’ve seen in the press—“10x ARR” or “20x EBITDA”—without understanding the underlying drivers. In practice, valuation is a function of growth rate, retention, margin profile, market positioning, and revenue quality.
For example, a SaaS company with 90% gross margins, 120% net revenue retention, and 40% YoY growth will command a very different multiple than one with flat growth and high churn—even if both have $10M in ARR.
As discussed in SaaS Valuation Multiples: A Guide for Investors and Entrepreneurs, understanding how buyers model your business is essential to setting realistic expectations and negotiating from a position of strength.
3. Overlooking Tax and Deal Structure Implications
Many founders focus on the top-line purchase price, but overlook how deal structure—asset sale vs. stock sale, earn-outs, escrows, rollover equity—affects their net proceeds. A poorly structured deal can result in significant tax leakage or delayed payouts.
For instance, in an asset sale, proceeds may be taxed at ordinary income rates rather than capital gains, depending on how the purchase price is allocated. Similarly, earn-outs tied to aggressive post-close targets can become contentious or unachievable.
We explore these nuances in Tax Law Changes and the Impact on Personal Taxes from Selling a Software Company and Asset versus Stock Sale. Engaging tax and legal advisors early—ideally before signing a Letter of Intent—can help optimize outcomes.
4. Failing to Vet the Buyer’s Intentions and Capabilities
Not all buyers are created equal. Some are strategic acquirers seeking long-term integration; others are financial sponsors looking for a platform to bolt on additional assets. Understanding a buyer’s track record, funding sources, and post-close plans is critical.
We’ve seen deals fall apart late in the process because the buyer lacked committed capital, or because cultural misalignment became apparent only after diligence began. In other cases, founders have accepted lower offers from buyers who offered better long-term alignment or smoother transitions.
Firms like iMerge help sellers assess buyer credibility and fit—not just price—by leveraging industry relationships and prior deal experience.
5. Underestimating the Emotional and Operational Toll
Running a software company is demanding. Running it while navigating an M&A process is exponentially more so. Founders often underestimate the time, focus, and emotional bandwidth required to manage diligence, negotiations, and internal communications—all while keeping the business on track.
Deals can take 6–9 months from initial outreach to close. During that time, performance must remain strong, key employees must be retained, and sensitive information must be carefully managed. A single missed quarter can materially impact valuation or derail the deal entirely.
As we noted in How Do I Manage the Emotional Aspects of Selling My Business?, having an experienced M&A advisor can help buffer the emotional highs and lows, allowing founders to stay focused on the business.
6. Poorly Managed Confidentiality
Leaks about a potential sale—whether to employees, customers, or competitors—can create unnecessary risk. Key staff may leave, customers may delay renewals, and competitors may use the uncertainty to their advantage.
Confidentiality must be tightly controlled throughout the process. This includes using NDAs, limiting information access, and carefully timing internal communications. As we explain in How Do I Ensure Confidentiality During the Sale Process?, a disciplined approach to information sharing is essential to preserving value and momentum.
7. Going It Alone
Perhaps the most consequential pitfall is attempting to sell the business without experienced M&A representation. While founders are experts in their product and market, M&A is a specialized discipline involving valuation modeling, buyer outreach, deal structuring, and negotiation strategy.
Without an advisor, sellers often:
- Undervalue their business or accept suboptimal terms
- Fail to create competitive tension among buyers
- Miss red flags in LOIs or purchase agreements
At iMerge, we’ve helped software founders avoid these traps by managing the process end-to-end—from pre-market preparation to post-close transition. Our sector focus and deal experience allow us to anticipate issues before they arise and drive better outcomes for our clients.
Conclusion
Selling a software business is a high-stakes endeavor. The right preparation, guidance, and strategic execution can mean the difference between a disappointing exit and a transformative one. By avoiding these common pitfalls, founders can position themselves for a smoother process and a more rewarding outcome.
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
by Michael Gravel | Apr 17, 2025 | iMerge M&A Dealmaker News
Summary of:
How Do I Value My Software Company’s Intellectual Property?
For software founders and CEOs, intellectual property (IP) is often the crown jewel of the business — the engine behind recurring revenue, competitive advantage, and ultimately, enterprise value. But when it comes time to raise capital, negotiate a strategic partnership, or prepare for an exit, the question becomes: how do you actually value your software company’s IP?
This article explores the key frameworks, valuation methods, and strategic considerations for assessing the worth of your software IP — whether it’s proprietary code, algorithms, patents, or data assets. We’ll also highlight how firms like iMerge help software companies translate technical assets into defensible deal value.
Why IP Valuation Matters in Software M&A
In traditional industries, valuation often centers on tangible assets and cash flow. In software, however, the most valuable assets are intangible — and often not even recorded on the balance sheet. This includes:
- Proprietary source code and architecture
- Patents and trade secrets
- Customer data and usage analytics
- Machine learning models and training data
- APIs, SDKs, and developer ecosystems
These assets can drive premium valuations, especially in strategic acquisitions. But they must be clearly articulated, legally protected, and economically justified to command value in a transaction.
Three Core Approaches to IP Valuation
There is no one-size-fits-all method for valuing software IP. However, most M&A professionals and valuation experts rely on one or more of the following approaches:
1. Income Approach
This method estimates the present value of future economic benefits derived from the IP. For example, if a proprietary algorithm enables a 20% cost reduction or drives $5M in annual upsell revenue, that incremental cash flow can be modeled and discounted to present value.
Common techniques include:
- Relief-from-Royalty: Estimates what the company would pay to license the IP if it didn’t own it.
- Incremental Cash Flow: Projects the additional earnings attributable to the IP versus a generic alternative.
This approach is especially useful when the IP is central to monetization — such as a SaaS platform’s core engine or a patented optimization algorithm.
2. Market Approach
Here, valuation is based on comparable transactions involving similar IP. For example, if a cybersecurity firm with patented threat detection tech sold for 8x revenue, that multiple may inform your own valuation — adjusted for scale, growth, and defensibility.
However, finding true comps can be difficult. IP is often unique, and deal terms are not always disclosed. That’s where experienced advisors like iMerge can add value by leveraging proprietary transaction data and industry benchmarks.
3. Cost Approach
This method estimates the cost to recreate the IP from scratch — including R&D, engineering time, and opportunity cost. While less common in M&A, it can serve as a floor value or be useful in litigation or tax contexts.
For example, if it would take 18 months and $3M to rebuild your platform, that may set a baseline for negotiations — though buyers typically pay for value created, not just cost incurred.
Key Drivers of Software IP Value
Regardless of method, several qualitative and quantitative factors influence how buyers and investors assess IP value:
- Legal Protection: Are patents filed? Is codebase ownership clear? Have contractors signed IP assignment agreements?
- Technical Differentiation: Does the IP solve a hard problem in a novel way? Is it difficult to replicate?
- Revenue Attribution: Can you tie specific revenue streams or cost savings directly to the IP?
- Scalability: Is the IP built to scale across markets, geographies, or verticals?
- Integration Risk: How easily can the IP be integrated into a buyer’s existing stack?
In our experience at iMerge, companies that proactively document and defend these attributes tend to command higher multiples and face fewer hurdles during due diligence. For more on this, see our Due Diligence Checklist for Software (SaaS) Companies.
Common Pitfalls in IP Valuation
Even technically strong companies can stumble when it comes to IP valuation. Here are a few red flags that can erode value or delay deals:
- Unclear IP Ownership: Early contractors or co-founders who never signed IP transfer agreements can create legal ambiguity.
- Open Source Exposure: Use of open-source libraries without proper licensing can raise compliance concerns.
- Overstated Claims: Inflating the uniqueness or defensibility of your IP without evidence can backfire during diligence.
- Neglected Documentation: Lack of technical documentation, version control, or audit trails can reduce buyer confidence.
These issues are not insurmountable, but they require early attention. As we noted in Completing Due Diligence Before the LOI, addressing IP risks proactively can prevent value erosion later in the process.
Strategic Use of IP in Deal Structuring
In some cases, IP can be used not just to justify valuation, but to shape deal terms. For example:
- Earn-Outs: If the IP is still being commercialized, buyers may tie part of the purchase price to future performance milestones.
- Licensing Agreements: Sellers may retain rights to use the IP in non-competing markets or spinouts.
- Equity Rollovers: Founders may retain a stake in the IP’s future upside post-acquisition.
These structures require careful negotiation and alignment of incentives. iMerge often works with founders to model different scenarios and optimize for both valuation and long-term outcomes. For more, see How Do I Handle Earn-Outs in the Sale of My Software Business?.
Conclusion
Valuing your software company’s intellectual property is both an art and a science. It requires a blend of financial modeling, legal clarity, and strategic storytelling — all grounded in a deep understanding of what drives value in the eyes of acquirers or investors.
Whether you’re preparing for a sale, raising growth capital, or simply planning ahead, understanding the value of your IP is essential to making informed decisions and maximizing outcomes.
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
by Michael Gravel | Apr 17, 2025 | iMerge M&A Dealmaker News
Summary of:
Strategic vs. Financial Buyers: What Software Founders Need to Know Before Selling
When a founder begins exploring an exit, one of the most consequential decisions is choosing the right type of buyer. While both strategic buyers and financial buyers can offer compelling valuations, their motivations, deal structures, and post-acquisition expectations differ significantly. Understanding these differences is essential for software and technology founders seeking not just liquidity, but the right long-term outcome for their business, team, and legacy.
This article breaks down the key distinctions between strategic and financial buyers, with a focus on how these dynamics play out in the software and SaaS M&A landscape.
Defining the Buyer Types
Strategic Buyers
Strategic buyers are typically operating companies—often competitors, partners, or firms in adjacent markets—looking to acquire businesses that complement or enhance their existing operations. Their goal is to create synergies, expand market share, or accelerate product development.
Examples include:
- A cybersecurity firm acquiring a threat intelligence startup to expand its product suite
- A large enterprise software company buying a vertical SaaS provider to enter a new industry
- A global tech conglomerate acquiring a regional player to gain geographic access
Financial Buyers
Financial buyers, such as private equity (PE) firms, family offices, or venture capitalists, are primarily focused on generating a return on investment. They typically acquire companies with the intent to grow them over a 3–7 year horizon and exit at a higher valuation.
These buyers may pursue:
- Platform investments (buying a company to serve as the foundation for future add-ons)
- Roll-up strategies (acquiring multiple similar businesses to create scale)
- Recapitalizations (providing liquidity to founders while retaining them for continued growth)
Key Differences That Matter to Founders
1. Motivation and Valuation Drivers
Strategic buyers often value synergies—cost savings, cross-selling opportunities, or accelerated product development. This can lead to higher valuations, especially if the target fills a critical gap in the acquirer’s roadmap.
Financial buyers, by contrast, base valuations on financial fundamentals: EBITDA, revenue growth, retention metrics, and scalability. They may offer lower headline multiples but more flexible deal structures, such as earn-outs or equity rollovers.
As we noted in EBITDA Multiples Continue to Trend Lower, financial buyers are increasingly disciplined in pricing, especially in a rising interest rate environment. Strategic buyers, however, may still pay a premium if the acquisition is mission-critical.
2. Deal Structure and Terms
Strategic buyers often prefer outright acquisitions—typically stock or asset purchases—with a clean break. They may require the founder to stay on for a short transition period, but long-term involvement is less common unless the founder plays a key technical or customer-facing role.
Financial buyers, on the other hand, frequently structure deals to keep founders involved. This could include:
- Equity rollovers (retaining a minority stake)
- Earn-outs tied to future performance
- Board participation or operational leadership roles
For founders seeking partial liquidity while continuing to grow the business, a financial buyer may be the better fit. For those ready to exit entirely, a strategic buyer may offer a cleaner path.
3. Post-Acquisition Integration
Strategic buyers often integrate the acquired company into their existing operations. This can mean changes to branding, systems, culture, and even personnel. While this may unlock synergies, it can also disrupt the acquired company’s identity and autonomy.
Financial buyers typically maintain the company as a standalone entity, at least initially. They may bring in new leadership or operational resources, but they often preserve the brand and team to maintain continuity and performance.
As we explored in Sell Website: Success After The Closing, the post-close experience can vary dramatically depending on the buyer type. Founders should consider not just the deal terms, but what life looks like after the ink dries.
4. Speed and Complexity of the Deal Process
Strategic buyers may move more slowly, especially if the deal requires board approval, regulatory review, or integration planning. However, they may also be more flexible on diligence if they already know the market or the team.
Financial buyers are often more process-driven. They conduct rigorous due diligence, including quality of earnings (QoE) reports, customer churn analysis, and legal reviews. While this can extend timelines, it also creates a more predictable process.
Firms like iMerge help founders navigate these complexities by preparing detailed financial packages, managing buyer communications, and anticipating diligence hurdles—especially when selling to institutional investors.
Which Buyer Is Right for You?
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. The right buyer depends on your goals, your company’s profile, and your appetite for continued involvement.
Consider the following scenarios:
- You want to retire or exit completely: A strategic buyer may offer a cleaner break.
- You want to de-risk but stay involved: A financial buyer can provide partial liquidity and growth capital.
- Your company fills a critical gap in a larger player’s strategy: A strategic buyer may pay a premium.
- Your business has strong recurring revenue and growth potential: A financial buyer may see it as a platform investment.
In some cases, founders may receive offers from both types of buyers. In these situations, the decision often comes down to more than just price—it’s about alignment, vision, and trust.
Final Thoughts
Whether you’re fielding inbound interest or preparing for a formal sale process, understanding the differences between strategic and financial buyers is essential. Each brings unique advantages—and trade-offs—that can shape the future of your company and your personal journey.
At iMerge, we help software and technology founders evaluate buyer types, structure deals that align with their goals, and maximize value throughout the M&A process. From exit planning to pre-LOI diligence, our team brings deep experience and founder-first perspective to every transaction.
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
by Michael Gravel | Apr 17, 2025 | iMerge M&A Dealmaker News
Summary of:
How to Maximize the Value of Your Software Company Before Selling
For software founders, the decision to sell is rarely just about timing — it’s about readiness. Not just your own, but your company’s. Whether you’re considering a full exit, recapitalization, or strategic acquisition, the months (or years) leading up to a sale are critical for value creation. The difference between a 4x and 8x EBITDA multiple often lies in the groundwork laid well before the first buyer conversation.
This article outlines the key levers that drive valuation in software M&A and how to position your company to command a premium.
1. Understand What Drives Valuation in Software M&A
Buyers — whether private equity firms, strategic acquirers, or growth investors — evaluate software companies through a consistent lens. The most influential factors include:
- Recurring revenue quality (e.g., ARR/MRR, churn, net revenue retention)
- Profitability and margin profile (especially EBITDA margins)
- Scalability of the platform (cloud-native, multi-tenant, API-first)
- Customer concentration and contract terms
- Growth trajectory and TAM (Total Addressable Market)
- Team depth and key person risk
Each of these factors contributes to the perceived risk and upside of your business. A company with 90% gross margins, 120% net revenue retention, and a diversified customer base will command a higher multiple than one with similar revenue but weaker fundamentals.
For a deeper dive into valuation mechanics, see Valuation Multiples for Software Companies.
2. Clean Up Financials and Reporting
One of the most common value-destroyers in M&A is poor financial hygiene. Buyers want to see GAAP-compliant financials, clear revenue recognition policies, and a clean chart of accounts. If your books are cash-based or lack accrual adjustments, now is the time to upgrade.
Consider preparing a Quality of Earnings (QoE) report — even before going to market. A QoE, typically prepared by a third-party accounting firm, validates your revenue, EBITDA, and working capital. It also helps you identify and adjust for one-time expenses or owner-related costs that may be added back to normalized earnings.
As we noted in What Is My Website Worth?, discretionary earnings and normalized EBITDA are often the foundation of valuation discussions. Presenting these clearly can materially impact your outcome.
3. Optimize Revenue Mix and Retention
Not all revenue is created equal. Buyers place a premium on:
- Recurring revenue (SaaS subscriptions, usage-based billing)
- Multi-year contracts with auto-renewal clauses
- High net revenue retention (NRR > 110% is ideal)
If your business includes a mix of one-time services and recurring revenue, consider shifting the model toward subscriptions or bundling services into annual contracts. Improving customer retention and reducing churn — even by a few percentage points — can significantly increase your valuation multiple.
For SaaS companies, understanding the key performance metrics (KPIs) that buyers track is essential. Metrics like CAC payback period, LTV/CAC ratio, and gross margin by cohort can tell a compelling growth story — or raise red flags.
4. Address Key Person Risk and Build a Scalable Team
Many founder-led software companies suffer from a common issue: the founder is too central to operations, sales, or product development. This creates “key person risk,” which can spook buyers or lead to earn-out-heavy deal structures.
To mitigate this:
- Document processes and delegate responsibilities
- Build a second layer of leadership (e.g., VP of Engineering, Head of Sales)
- Incentivize key employees with retention bonuses or equity
Buyers want to know the business can thrive without the founder. The more autonomous your team, the more transferable — and valuable — your company becomes.
5. Prepare for Diligence Before the LOI
Due diligence is no longer a post-LOI exercise. Sophisticated buyers now expect a high degree of transparency and readiness even during initial conversations. That means having your legal, financial, and operational documentation in order well in advance.
Start with a due diligence checklist tailored to software companies. This includes:
- Customer contracts and renewal schedules
- IP assignments and licensing agreements
- Cap table and equity grants
- Privacy policies and compliance documentation (e.g., GDPR, SOC 2)
Firms like iMerge often work with founders months before a formal sale process to identify and resolve diligence red flags early — a step that can prevent deal erosion later.
6. Position Strategically for the Right Buyer
Maximizing value isn’t just about cleaning up your business — it’s about telling the right story to the right buyer. A strategic acquirer may value your product roadmap or customer base more than your EBITDA. A private equity firm may focus on your growth levers and margin expansion potential.
Tailor your positioning accordingly. For example:
- Highlight cross-sell opportunities for strategic buyers
- Show scalability and operational leverage for PE firms
- Emphasize defensible IP and data assets for AI-focused acquirers
As we explored in What Criteria Investment Companies Look for in Acquiring a Software Business, buyer personas vary widely — and so should your narrative.
7. Engage an M&A Advisor Early
Finally, one of the most effective ways to maximize value is to work with an experienced M&A advisor who understands the software landscape. A firm like iMerge can help you:
- Benchmark your valuation against recent comps
- Craft a compelling Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM)
- Run a competitive process to attract multiple offers
- Negotiate deal terms, including earn-outs, escrows, and rollover equity
In many cases, the advisor’s fee is more than offset by the increase in deal value and improved terms they help secure. As we’ve seen in 8 Ways Top M&A Advisors Increase Value During the Transaction, the right advisor can be a force multiplier.
Conclusion
Maximizing the value of your software company before a sale is not about last-minute window dressing — it’s about building a business that buyers want to own. That means strong financials, recurring revenue, a scalable team, and a clear growth story. With the right preparation and guidance, you can shift the conversation from “what’s your asking price?” to “how do we win this deal?”
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
by Michael Gravel | Apr 17, 2025 | iMerge M&A Dealmaker News
Summary of:
Software Company Valuations in 2025: Trends, Multiples, and Strategic Implications
As we move into 2025, software company valuations are entering a new phase—one shaped by macroeconomic recalibration, AI-driven disruption, and a more disciplined capital environment. For founders, CEOs, and investors, understanding the evolving valuation landscape is not just a matter of pricing—it’s a strategic imperative that informs everything from capital raises to exit timing.
This article explores the key trends shaping software company valuations in 2025, with a focus on SaaS, AI-enabled platforms, and vertical software businesses. We’ll also examine how buyers—both strategic and financial—are recalibrating their models, and what that means for deal structuring and exit planning.
1. Valuation Multiples Are Stabilizing—But Below 2021 Highs
After the correction that began in late 2022, software valuation multiples have largely stabilized in 2024 and are expected to remain steady into 2025. However, they are doing so at a “new normal” level—typically 20–40% below the frothy peaks of 2021.
- Public SaaS multiples are averaging 6–8x forward revenue, down from 15–20x in 2021, according to SaaS Capital.
- Private SaaS deals are seeing 3–6x ARR multiples, with premium valuations reserved for companies with strong net retention, efficient growth, and vertical market dominance.
- EBITDA-based valuations for mature software firms are trending between 8–12x, depending on growth, margins, and customer concentration. See our deeper dive in EBITDA Multiples Continue to Trend Lower.
While the market has cooled from its speculative highs, this recalibration is not necessarily bad news. Buyers are still active—especially private equity firms executing roll-up strategies—and disciplined operators are commanding healthy premiums.
2. AI-Enabled Software Is Creating a Two-Tier Market
One of the most significant valuation bifurcations in 2025 is between traditional SaaS and AI-native or AI-augmented platforms. Buyers are increasingly willing to pay a premium for companies that have successfully embedded AI into their core workflows—especially if it drives measurable efficiency or customer stickiness.
However, not all AI is valued equally. Acquirers are scrutinizing:
- Proprietary models vs. API wrappers
- Training data ownership and compliance
- Demonstrable ROI from AI features
As we noted in What are buyers looking for in AI and SaaS company acquisitions in 2025?, companies that can show AI-driven margin expansion or churn reduction are seeing valuation uplifts of 1–2x revenue compared to peers.
3. Efficiency Metrics Are Driving Premiums
Gone are the days when growth-at-all-costs was the dominant narrative. In 2025, buyers are laser-focused on efficiency metrics such as:
- Rule of 40 (growth rate + EBITDA margin)
- Net revenue retention (NRR)
- Customer acquisition cost (CAC) payback
- Gross margin consistency
Companies that exceed the Rule of 40, maintain NRR above 120%, and show CAC payback under 12 months are consistently achieving top-quartile valuations. For founders preparing for a sale, aligning internal metrics with these benchmarks is critical. Our article on SaaS Key Performance Metrics and Valuation Multiples offers a detailed breakdown of how these KPIs influence deal outcomes.
4. Vertical SaaS and Mission-Critical Tools Are in High Demand
In a more selective market, acquirers are gravitating toward software companies that serve niche verticals with high switching costs. These businesses often enjoy:
- Lower churn due to industry-specific workflows
- Pricing power from deep domain expertise
- Defensible moats through integrations and compliance features
As a result, vertical SaaS companies—especially in healthcare, legal tech, logistics, and construction—are commanding higher revenue multiples than horizontal tools with broader but shallower adoption.
5. Private Equity Remains a Dominant Buyer Class
Private equity firms continue to be the most active acquirers in the software space, particularly in the lower middle market ($5M–$50M ARR). Their playbook often includes:
- Platform acquisitions at 4–6x ARR
- Follow-on tuck-ins at 2–4x ARR
- Operational improvements to drive EBITDA expansion
For founders, this means that even if your company isn’t a unicorn, it may still be highly attractive as a strategic bolt-on. Firms like iMerge often help sellers position their business as a valuable puzzle piece in a larger roll-up strategy—especially when preparing for exit planning or evaluating unsolicited offers.
6. Deal Structuring Is More Nuanced
With buyers more cautious and capital more expensive, deal structures in 2025 are increasingly complex. Earn-outs, seller financing, and equity rollovers are more common—especially in deals where valuation expectations exceed what buyers are willing to pay upfront.
Founders should be prepared to negotiate:
- Performance-based earn-outs tied to revenue or EBITDA milestones
- Equity rollovers into the acquiring entity or PE platform
- Working capital adjustments and escrow holdbacks
Understanding these mechanisms—and how they affect your net proceeds—is essential. Our guide on earn-outs in software M&A offers practical advice for navigating these negotiations.
Conclusion: Strategic Positioning Matters More Than Ever
In 2025, software company valuations are no longer driven by hype—they’re driven by fundamentals, differentiation, and strategic fit. Founders who can articulate a clear value proposition, demonstrate efficient growth, and prepare for buyer scrutiny will be best positioned to command premium outcomes.
Whether you’re considering a full exit, recapitalization, or growth equity round, the key is preparation. That means aligning your metrics, cleaning up your financials, and understanding how buyers will view your business through their lens.
Founders navigating valuation or deal structuring decisions can benefit from iMerge’s experience in software and tech exits — reach out for guidance tailored to your situation.
